Program design
A wrap-up is a site policy. It covers work at a described place, and the description is usually a legal parcel. Construction, unhelpfully, does not stay inside legal parcels.
One of four program design decisions.
Coverage attaches to operations at the designated project site. A trade that is enrolled in the wrap is covered for what it does there, and not for what it does anywhere else.
That leaves a real gap. Fabrication in a shop, staging in a leased yard, deliveries on public roads and off-site utility tie-ins are all part of building the project and none of them happen on the parcel.
The fix is partly drafting, by describing the location broadly enough to catch the work, and partly insurance the trades keep for themselves. Enrolled subcontractors are still required to carry their own practice policy for off-site exposure.
The wording
A wrap-up attaches to a place. The policy names a designated project site and covers operations there, and the description of that site is usually taken from the development documents: a street address, a legal parcel description, or an assessor's parcel number.
That is precise, which is useful, and narrow, which is not. The question an underwriter asks is where coverage is provided, and the options are broader than most proposals use. Coverage can be limited to the project site, or it can extend to temporary storage, transit, off-site locations, staging areas and other places. Each of those extensions is available. None of them appears by default.
So the first thing to do with a draft is read the location description and compare it against how the project is actually going to be built.
The gap
Construction does not stay inside the parcel. A realistic list of the work that happens off the described site on a normal project:
| Activity | Where it happens | Usually covered by |
|---|---|---|
| Fabrication and prefabrication | The trade's own shop | The trade's own general liability, products and completed operations |
| Panel and module assembly | A separate yard, sometimes leased for the project | Depends entirely on the location wording |
| Material staging and laydown | An adjacent lot or a nearby yard | Can be brought in by extending the described location |
| Transit and delivery | Public roads | Automobile liability, which is almost never inside a wrap |
| Utility tie-ins and street work | Public right of way beyond the parcel line | Often needs the location described to include the adjacent right of way |
| Soil export and import | Haul routes and disposal sites | Trucking and disposal contractors' own policies, usually excluded parties |
| Crane and equipment movement | Street closures and adjacent property | Depends on wording, and on the agreements with the neighbors |
Two of these are the ones that cause arguments. Off-site fabrication, because a panel built badly in a shop causes damage on site, and it is genuinely debatable whether that is work at the site or a product delivered to it. And off-site staging, because a leased yard three blocks away feels like part of the project to everyone on the job and is not part of it in the policy.
What to do
Part of the fix is in the policy and part of it is in the subcontracts. Both are needed.
In the policy. Describe the location broadly enough to catch the work. That can mean naming the parcel plus the adjacent right of way, naming a specific staging or laydown area by address, or adding a general extension for temporary off-site storage and locations incidental to the project. The underwriter will want to know what is being added, which means the project team has to know where work will actually happen before binding. On a project where that is not yet settled, a broader general extension is worth more than a precise list that turns out to be wrong.
In the subcontracts. Enrolled subcontractors must be required to keep their own practice general liability in force, with adequate limits and no exclusion that would defeat it, for everything they do off the covered location. This is not optional and it is not a formality. A trade that cancels its own policy on enrolling in the wrap, believing the wrap covers it, has no coverage for its shop work, its deliveries or any of its other jobs.
That requirement is also the single most common misunderstanding subcontractors have about wrap-ups, which makes it worth stating plainly in the enrollment materials rather than only in the subcontract.
Edge cases
Three situations make the location question harder than a single parcel.
Phased sites. Where a large parcel is developed in phases over several years, part of the site may be complete and occupied while construction continues next to it. The policy has to be clear about which parts are still under construction, which have moved into completed operations, and what happens to a claim arising from the boundary between them.
Occupied renovation. A building that is partly operating while being worked on creates the same problem indoors. The operational exposure belongs to the owner's own property and liability program, the construction exposure belongs to the wrap, and a slip on a floor shared by both is a question nobody wants to answer after the fact.
Linear and scattered sites. Roadway, utility and infrastructure-adjacent work does not have a parcel at all. The location gets described as a corridor, a set of stations or a scope, and the precision of that description is the whole protection.
Where several distinct sites are involved, the question stops being how to describe one location and becomes whether they belong in one program at all. The multiple projects page takes that up.
Questions
Normally not. Coverage attaches to operations at the designated project site. Work in a trade's own shop, deliveries on public roads and work on its other jobs sit outside the program and have to be covered by the trade's own policy.
Usually yes, by describing it in the policy or by adding an extension for temporary off-site storage and locations incidental to the project. It has to be asked for. The underwriter will want to know what is being added, so the project team needs to know where work will actually happen before the program is bound.
It is one of the two activities that cause the most argument, because a component fabricated badly in a shop causes damage at the site and it is genuinely debatable whether that is work at the site or a product delivered to it. The reliable answer is to settle it in the wording rather than leave it to be decided after a loss, and to keep the fabricator's own products and completed operations coverage in force regardless.
Almost never. Deliveries, haulage and vehicle movement on public roads are covered by automobile policies, which sit outside the wrap and remain the responsibility of whoever owns the vehicles.
Yes, always, and the subcontract should require it with adequate limits. A trade that cancels its own policy on enrolling has no coverage for its shop, its deliveries or any of its other projects. This is the most common misunderstanding subcontractors have about wrap-ups, so it belongs in the enrollment materials and not only in the contract.
As a corridor, a set of described locations, or by reference to a defined scope of work. On linear and scattered sites the precision of that description is effectively the whole protection, so it deserves as much attention as the limit does.
Next
The other three design decisions.
Who you would be working with
Managing Director · ISU Insurance Services of San Francisco
Cary handles the wrap-up placements here. He has spent 38 years in construction insurance. The first ten were on the carrier side, underwriting builders’ risk and complex property exposures. The 28 since have been in retail brokerage, advising residential developers, general contractors and other construction clients on project-specific and annual programs.
He is also one of the original authors of the project liability application that much of the industry still uses to submit wrap-ups to carriers. In practice that means he knows what each question is actually asking for, and where a thin answer will cost you at quote.
Pricing
Tell us about the project and we will give you a straight answer on whether a wrap makes sense for it. If it does not, we will say so, and then we will price the structure that does. That answer is worth more to you than a placement that costs more than it saves. There is no project minimum to ask. This goes straight to Cary White, who handles wrap-up placements for our construction clients.