Contractor-Controlled Insurance Programs
A CCIP puts the general contractor and every enrolled subcontractor under one liability and workers’ compensation program for the project, sponsored and controlled by the contractor. Done well it lowers the total cost of risk on the job and gives the contractor control of its own claims. Done carelessly it transfers exposure the contractor never priced.
Placed for general contractors, construction managers and developers nationwide by ISU Insurance Services of San Francisco.
A Contractor-Controlled Insurance Program, also called a contractor wrap-up. The general contractor or construction manager buys a single program covering itself and all enrolled subcontractors for work at one project site.
It normally provides general liability, excess liability and workers’ compensation, and it extends completed-operations coverage for years after the job finishes.
When the project owner sponsors the same structure instead, it is called an OCIP.
Mechanics
Ordinarily every contractor on a job carries its own insurance and builds the cost into its bid. Twenty subcontractors means twenty policies, twenty sets of limits, twenty certificates to chase, twenty carriers with their own ideas about who pays when something goes wrong, and a certificate-tracking job that never quite catches the sub who let coverage lapse in month nine.
A CCIP replaces that. The general contractor buys one program for the site. Enrolled subcontractors come in as insureds and deduct their own insurance cost from their bids, so the contractor is paying for coverage once rather than paying twenty markups for it.
The case for it
Sponsoring a wrap means the contractor is now carrying the retention, the administration and the tail. On a program with a $250,000 self-insured retention, the contractor is effectively self-insuring the first quarter million of every claim on the site for as long as the tail runs. That has to be funded, secured and reflected in the bid. Contractors who treat a CCIP purely as a margin opportunity tend to find this out in year three.
Scope
Wrap-up coverage is broad within a narrow boundary. The boundary is the job site.
| Coverage | In the wrap? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| General liability | Usually | The core of the program, with completed operations extended for years past close-out |
| Excess / umbrella liability | Usually | Towers of $25M to $100M or more are routine on large projects |
| Workers’ compensation | Usually | For enrolled contractors’ on-site payroll only |
| Contractors pollution liability | Sometimes | Often placed alongside rather than inside, and priced separately |
| Builders risk | Rarely | Covers damage to the work itself; normally a separate policy, usually bought by the owner |
| Professional liability | No | Design and design-build risk needs its own program |
| Automobile liability | No | Stays on each contractor’s own policy |
| Off-site work | No | Shops, yards, fabrication, staging areas and travel stay outside |
| Tools and equipment | No | Each contractor’s own problem |
Most programs exclude the same categories, and the exclusions are usually non-negotiable with the carrier.
Excluded contractors work under their own insurance and are required to evidence specified limits. Their bids should not carry an insurance deduction, and that needs to be caught at bid time rather than at audit.
Structure
A single-project CCIP covers one job. A rolling CCIP covers every qualifying project the contractor starts during an enrollment window, usually two or three years, with each project attaching as it begins.
Rolling is where most contractor wrap-up value sits. Three things change.
The single most important term on a rolling program is whether the general liability and completed-operations aggregates apply per project or across the whole program. A shared aggregate means losses on one job reduce what is available on every other, potentially for a decade. Owners on your projects will ask about this, and lenders certainly will. A per-project aggregate costs more and is usually worth it.
Economics
The premium is typically somewhere in the range of one to two percent of hard construction value before credits, with a wide spread around that. Project type, jurisdiction, loss history, retention, tower structure and tail length all move it materially. Residential and mixed-use work prices differently from commercial, in some markets very differently.
Subcontractors state their insurance cost separately and it is deducted from their bid, because the wrap is providing that coverage instead. The mechanism only works if bid instructions are explicit and the deductions are verified. Subs routinely understate the cost, which means the contractor is buying coverage for them and only recovering part of it. Requiring a rate per $100 of payroll, supported by the sub’s own declarations page, is the practical fix.
Most contractor wraps of any size carry a deductible or self-insured retention, frequently between $100,000 and $500,000 per occurrence. Below the retention the contractor is paying claims out of pocket, and the carrier will usually require collateral, most often a letter of credit, to secure it. That letter of credit consumes bonding and borrowing capacity for years, which belongs in the analysis alongside the premium.
Premium is estimated on projected payroll and trued up at close-out against actual payroll by class code. Programs that let subs report sloppily, or that let wrapped and unwrapped payroll blur together, produce audit surprises well into six figures. Reporting discipline during the job is what prevents that.
Administration
Enrollment is the operational heart of the program and the part most often underestimated. Every subcontractor and every lower-tier sub has to be enrolled before setting foot on site.
Somebody has to run this, chase the paperwork, and stop unenrolled crews at the gate. On a large program it is a third-party administrator. On a smaller one it lands on a project engineer who also has a day job, and that is where programs come apart.
Enrolled subcontractors regularly assume the wrap covers them generally. It does not. It covers work performed at that job site. Their shop, their yard, their vehicles, their tools, their employees driving between jobs and every other project they are running stay on their own policy. Telling subs this clearly at enrollment prevents a bad conversation after a loss.
The other side of the table
If you are offering a CCIP on a pursuit, expect a sophisticated owner or its broker to come back with a list. Knowing it in advance lets you price it rather than concede it late.
Each of these has a price. Working out what they cost before the owner asks is the difference between a negotiation and a giveaway.
Submission
Carrier appetite is rarely what holds up a wrap-up submission. Assembling the file is. Having these ready shortens the process by weeks.
Description, location, hard construction value, start date and duration, occupancy type, height, and whether any part of it is residential or will be converted to residential.
Estimated payroll by workers’ compensation class code for the whole project, broken out by trade. This is the number underwriters price from, and a vague version gets a loaded quote.
Five years of valued loss runs for the sponsor, and for major subcontractors where you can get them. Currently valued, not a summary.
Written program, EMR history, OSHA logs, site-specific safety plan, drug testing policy, subcontractor prequalification criteria. Wrap-up underwriters weight this heavily.
Owner, contractor, construction manager, major trades, and the contractual structure between them. Also who will administer enrollment.
Coverages sought, limits and tower, retention level, tail length, single-project or rolling, and whether the owner has requirements already fixed in the construction contract.
Experience
FAQ
Contractor-Controlled Insurance Program. It is a wrap-up sponsored by the general contractor or construction manager, covering itself and all enrolled subcontractors for work at the project site. Usually general liability, excess liability and workers’ compensation, with completed operations extended for years after the job closes out. When the owner sponsors the same structure it is called an OCIP.
Yes, CCIP is simply the abbreviation. You will also see it called a contractor wrap, a contractor-sponsored wrap-up, or just a wrap. All of them describe one program covering multiple contractors on one project, bought by the contractor.
For a single project, roughly $25 million in hard construction value is where it starts to make sense and around $50 million is where it usually clearly does. Those are conventions rather than rules. A rolling program changes the answer a great deal, because projects well under $25 million can attach to a program priced on the whole pipeline. If you start several mid-sized jobs a year, look at a rolling structure before concluding your work is too small to wrap.
Yes, always. The wrap covers enrolled parties for work performed at that job site only. Shops, yards, vehicles, tools, employees travelling between jobs and every other project they are running stay on their own policies. Most programs also require enrolled subs to maintain stated limits for off-site work and to name the sponsor as an additional insured on that policy.
Generally no. Enrollment is a condition of the subcontract on nearly every program. The exceptions are trades the program itself excludes, commonly hazardous materials contractors, truckers and suppliers who do not perform on-site installation, design professionals, and contractors below a stated contract-value threshold. Those parties work under their own insurance and must evidence the limits the subcontract requires.
Payroll and losses inside the wrap are generally excluded from the sub’s own workers’ compensation experience rating. For a sub doing occasional wrapped work that is a minor effect. For one whose work is mostly wrapped, it leaves a thin rating history on its own policy, which can make the mod move sharply on small changes. It is worth a conversation with their broker before a large share of payroll moves into wrapped work.
Plan on 60 to 90 days from complete submission to bound program on a large project, and longer for residential or unusually hazardous work. The time goes into assembling payroll by class code, five years of valued loss runs and the safety documentation, rather than into finding a carrier. Starting the submission while the project is still being bid is the single best way to compress it.
Usually not. Builders risk covers physical damage to the work itself and is normally placed as a separate policy, most often by the owner. It is frequently bought at the same time and coordinated with the wrap, particularly around deductibles and the definition of the covered project, but it sits outside the program.
The policies remain in force for their terms and continue to answer for occurrences during the period they covered, since wrap-up liability coverage is occurrence-based. The practical problems are elsewhere. An unsecured self-insured retention behind a failed contractor may never be funded, nobody is left to administer claims or the audit, and the certificates owners rely on stop arriving. This is exactly why owners ask for security on the retention and for annual evidence of coverage through the tail.
Who you would be working with
Managing Director · ISU Insurance Services of San Francisco
Cary handles the wrap-up placements here. He has spent 38 years in construction insurance. The first ten were on the carrier side, underwriting builders’ risk and complex property exposures. The 28 since have been in retail brokerage, advising residential developers, general contractors and other construction clients on project-specific and annual programs.
He is also one of the original authors of the project liability application that much of the industry still uses to submit wrap-ups to carriers. In practice that means he knows what each question is actually asking for, and where a thin answer will cost you at quote.
Pricing
Tell us about the project and we will give you a straight answer on whether a wrap makes sense for it. If it does not, we will say so. That answer is worth more to you than a placement that costs more than it saves. This goes straight to Cary White, who handles wrap-up placements for our construction clients.